Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch)
z-ai/glm-5.3:batch
Model weightsGLM-5.3 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai, built for complex software engineering and long-horizon agent tasks. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, and improves on GLM-5.2 in coding and in the balance between performance and token efficiency.
Reasoning is always on and cannot be disabled. Reasoning efforts low, high, and max are supported; max is the default.
Providers
Different companies host the same model. OpenRouter routes your request to one of them based on the routing mode you pick: Balanced (price + speed), Nitro (fastest), or Floor (cheapest).
| $0.72$0.45 | $3.20$2.00 | $0.16$0.10 | -- | -- | ||
| $0.70 | $2.20 | $0.13 | -- | -- |
Input $0.45 / Output $2.0038% off-- tok/s-- uptime- Input $0.70 / Output $2.20-- tok/s-- uptime
Pricing
The average price customers actually pay for this model, next to the prices providers post. Caching and discounts mean the price actually paid is often well below the listed one.
Weighted average
GLM 5.3 (batch) — Price history
| $0.00 | $0.00 | 22.0% | 100.0% | ||
| $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
- Effective in $0.00 / Effective out $0.00Token share100.0%
- Effective in $0.00 / Effective out $0.00Token share0.0%
Performance
Throughput is how fast the model writes (tokens per second — higher is better). Latency is total round-trip time (lower is better). TTFT is time-to-first-token — how long before you see anything appear (lower is better).
Uptime
Uptime is the percentage of the past 3 days that at least one provider was responding to requests. Availability is the percentage of time that inference was successfully served. OpenRouter continuously monitors and uses the next-best provider when one returns an error.
Not enough uptime data to display yet.
When an error occurs in an upstream provider, we can recover by routing to another healthy provider, if your request filters allow it. You can access per-provider uptime data programmatically through the Endpoints API. Learn more about our load balancing and provider routing options.
Benchmarks
Scores on standardized evaluations and this model’s own outputs on shared benchmark prompts. Higher percentages are better — and each rank shows where this model lands among the models evaluated on that source.
| Source | Benchmark | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) Intelligence Index | 31.7 |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) Coding Index | 74.8 |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) Agentic Index | 53.1 |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) GPQA Diamond | 91.7% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) HLE | 42.3% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) AA-LCR | 79.7% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) τ-Bench Banking | 50.3% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) GDPval-AA | 57.7% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) CritPt | 19.1% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) SciCode | 59.0% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 41.9% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 83.9% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) AA-Omniscience Accuracy | 32.3% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Max) AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate | 61.1% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Low) Intelligence Index | 23.1 |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Low) HLE | 36.6% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Low) AA-LCR | 72.7% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Low) GDPval-AA | 41.6% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Low) CritPt | 14.6% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Low) SciCode | 42.0% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Low) Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 34.8% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Low) AA-Omniscience Accuracy | 31.9% |
| Artificial Analysis | GLM-5.3 (Low) AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate | 36.8% |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Models Arena 3D Elo | 1295 |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Models Arena Asciiart Elo | 1208 |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Models Arena Code Categories Elo | 1284 |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Models Arena Data Visualization Elo | 1251 |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Models Arena Game Development Elo | 1288 |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Models Arena SVG Elo | 1246 |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Models Arena UI Component Elo | 1285 |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Models Arena Website Elo | 1279 |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Agents Arena Htmlslides Elo | 1189 |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Agents Arena Mobile Apps Elo | 1184 |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Agents Arena Python-Pptxslides Elo | 1216 |
| Design Arena | GLM-5.3 Agents Arena Webapps Elo | 1270 |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Access to Justice Benchmark | 73.7% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Code Migration v1.1 | 55.1% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 CyberBench v1.1 | 72.1% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 EMB v1.1 | 69.1% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Finance Agent v2.1 | 65.0% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Vals Finance Index | 61.4% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Financial Coaching Bench | 74.1% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 GPQA Diamond | 88.1% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 HLAB-Vals-1.1 | 14.6% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Immigration | 66.7% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 IOI | 68.4% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 LiveCodeBench | 80.5% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 LegalBench | 84.8% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Vals Legal Index | 74.6% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Legal Research Bench | 49.0% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 MedCode | 42.9% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 MedScribe | 88.8% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 MMLU Pro | 86.8% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 MysteryMechanism | 23.0% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 ProgramBench | 1.5% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 ProofBench v1.1 | 49.0% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Public Benefits Bench v1.1 | 68.5% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Vals RSI Index | 22.9% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 SkillsBench | 47.5% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 SRE Bench | 9.2% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 SWE-bench | 95.4% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Tax Agent Bench | 43.3% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 TaxEval v2 | 72.4% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 38.9% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Terminal-Bench-Science | 5.7% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Vals Index | 59.8% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Vibe Code Bench 1-100 v1.1 | 29.8% |
| Vals AI | GLM 5.3 Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 78.1% |
Apps
Public apps that send the most traffic to this model. Good signal for what real production workloads look like — and a hint at which use cases this model is best suited for.
Not enough data for apps using this model yet.
Activity
Token volume and request traffic to this model over time.
API
Drop-in code to call this model. OpenRouter's API is OpenAI-compatible — most SDKs work by just swapping the base URL. The only thing that changes between models is the model slug below.
Not currently available through EU in-region routing. In-region routing docs
Documentation
Guides, cookbooks, blog posts, and tools for building with Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch) on OpenRouter.
Frequently asked questions
GLM-5.3 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai, built for complex software engineering and long-horizon agent tasks. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, and improves on GLM-5.2 in coding and in the balance between performance and token efficiency. Reasoning is always on and cannot be disabled. Reasoning efforts low, high, and max are supported; max is the default.
The GLM 5.3 (batch) documentation on OpenRouter includes the Self-Hosted LLM vs API: When Does Self-Hosting Pay Off blog post and the How to Benchmark LLMs blog post. The quickstart covers API keys and your first request, and the API reference lists every parameter.
GLM 5.3 (batch) costs $0.45/M input tokens and $2.00/M output tokens, with separate rates for Cache Read at $0.10/M tokens.
GLM 5.3 (batch) has a 1,048,576 token context window. It supports up to 131,072 completion tokens.
Yes. GLM 5.3 (batch) accepts tools and tool_choice for function calling. It also supports structured outputs via a JSON schema in response_format.
GLM 5.3 (batch) is served by 2 providers on OpenRouter: DeepInfra and Together. Requests are routed to the best available provider, with automatic failover to the others, and you can pin or exclude providers with provider routing.
GLM 5.3 (batch) was released on August 18, 2026.